When my mild-mannered friend Der Gute was preparing to study in Canada, I warned him that people might give him a tough time for being German. It's been at least forty years since we've had a big migration of Germans, so nobody bothers to teach Canadian kids not to be rude to Germans. And World War 2 is refought on TV nightly."What do I do if they do?" he asked.
"Tell them you were born in 198-," I said.
So Der Gute went to Canada and, sure enough, people made jokes about his Germanness and some Polish foreign student made his life miserable, but Der Gute hung onto the thought that he was born in 198- and Hitler was not his fault.
This is a terrible week for the Catholic Church in Ireland. Terrible. Of course, it is entirely the fault of some bishops and priests and cops (many now dead) in Ireland, just as the scandals in Irish-dominated Newfoundland and Irish-dominated Boston were entirely the fault of some bishops and priests and cops in Newfoundland and Boston.
If my experience of Canada and the USA are anything to go by, I predict four outcomes: 1. the public at large will blame all bishops and all priests (though not all cops), 2. the public at large will neglect to remember that the kids who were abused were Catholics themselves and use the scandal to demonise practising Catholics, 3. the public at large will suspend their belief that most child abusers were themselves abused as children and 4. innocent priests are going to be insulted to their faces, including ones in their twenties.
This would be a good week to pray for good priests, especially good priests in Ireland, especially good young priests in Ireland. This is a time for laypeople to embrace their good priest friends and to befriend other priests. The worst thing we can do is make good priests feel isolated and defensive and unloved.
Maybe it was a better life for priests when they had as much importance in a village as any other tradesman. A mediaeval secular priest had his cow, his little garden, his little profit, his little church and his pastoral duties. He was not raised above his fellow villagers as a spiritual superman. He was not left in splendid isolation, a rival authority to the mayor or parish council president. However, such simple priests didn't always know how to read or preach, so there were various reforms which led to the situation of the 19th century priest-boss who had lots of obedient parishioners but very few friends, unlimited power but no-one to love.
I have a priest friend who loves to meet married couples. He loves female companionship, and I had to smile once when he enthused about a young married woman he had met, briefly mentioned her husband and said, "That's a great married couple to be friends with." Now I could be wrong, but what I think he meant was, "That's a safe woman to be friends with." And I'm all in favour of priests having prudent and chaste woman friends, woman friends happily married to someone else. And the more friends the better. Safety in numbers.
The difficulty of parish priests in making friendships was brought home to me when I did an M.Div. and listened to lectures about clerical misconduct. There was a strong emphasis on not confusing roles. Just as a doctor shouldn't practise on members of his or her own family, a priest shouldn't depend on the people he ministers to for affection. And, therefore, a priest should look outside his parish for his emotional support. With parishioners, he has to be professional. The same holds true for lay ministers.
A female classmate and I worried about this, since if we got jobs ministering professionally in a parish, that would mean we wouldn't be able to date anyone we met in that parish. Being obsessed with romance and marriage, that was a real problem for us. Meanwhile, we wondered about priests stuck in isolated areas, where the only people around were parishioners. And what about priests (and lay ministers) with no extended families?
So how do priests and laypeople balance friendship and prudence? First, I think laypeople should stop thinking of celibate priests as spiritual supermen. They're single men called to be priests. They like the stuff single men like. They suffer the problems single men suffer. They get lonely on Friday nights. They eat out of tins over the sink. They like to be invited to parties. They like to go out with friends to the movies. They like women who don't make scary demands of them.
So it would be nice if laypeople, especially married laypeople or other single men, asked priests to dinners, parties and the odd movie from time to time. Not teenagers. If you're too young to hang out with middle-aged laymen, you're too young to hang out with middle-aged priests.
Some priests have to turn down their parishioners' social invitations because other parishioners start wondering if there is favouritism going on, blah, blah, blah. That's okay. But it would be nice if people made friends with priests not of their own parish. I do. Meanwhile, priests who don't have friends should consult with their spiritual directors.
Meanwhile, the least we can do for good priests, especially good Irish priests, at this time of horrible revelations about the revolting behaviour of some Irish bishops, some Irish priests and some Irish cops, is to pray for them. So let's pray for them.
It should go without saying that we must pray for the survivors of sexual abuse, too.

15 comments:
Hello
I have just found your blog and I think it is very good. This post, highlighting a very sad situation, is well written and thought provoking. Indeed we should pray for our priests and help them as much as possible. Theirs can be a very lonely life. And, yes, we surely should pray for those who are abused. You made a valid point when you said that we sometimes forget that most abusers were abused themselves. We also forget that there are abusers in all states of life - including fathers, mothers, grandparents, clergy of all denominations, etc. I don't say this to excuse priests because there is no excusing abuse, but just to remind folks that Catholics (even Irish-dominated ones??) don't have the monopoly on abusers. Thanks for a good blog.
Thanks, bread girl. As a matter of fact, I think sexual abuse of human beings is epidemic worldwide.
I do not know if there is an "Irish connection" in clerical sexual abuse, as some people are beginning to say, other than that those who are abused go on to abuse themselves, and this cycle unfortunately survives emigration.
Thailand and India have child prostitution. And even in the relatively wealthy and peaceful West, there may be many thousands of children and teens being sexually exploited by older men (often relatives and their friends) and, in some cases, women. How many parents turn blind eyes to their underage daughters' "relationships" with grown men?
What makes the Irish (and American and Canadian and Australian) Church sex abuse scandals so much more newsworthy than secular (or other religious) sex abuse is the contrast between what the Church teaches and what these appalling Churchmen have done. The spiritual role of these priests and bishops also highlights the utter evil perpetrated on children and teens, children and teens who may have grown up to abuse others.
Meanwhile, there is such a danger of good priests being scapegoated for what is not at all their fault. One of my priest friends, a lovely, scholarly, holy man, was spat on in the street by a stranger.
Also meanwhile, and I am not drawing parallels between this and the criminal abuse of children and teens, there are lonely and needy adult men and women who try to begin romantic/sexual relationships with kindly priests.
Therefore, laypeople who befriend priests must be HONEST with themselves about their motives.
And priests, without becoming paranoid, should be aware of the dangers of needy people, too.
Thankyou for a well written and thoughtful post Seraphic. Although I am not Catholic, I do have one priest friend, and perhaps I (and my husband) should make an effort to reach out to him, not being his parishioners.
Great idea, if you do like him! Just like other single men, priests are a mixed bag. Some are wonderful, some are neurotic, some are fun, some are dull, some are saints, some are crooks. Treat him as you would any other bachelor you and your husband think you'd like to get to know better, that's my advice.
The problem is not the priests really. I mean, of course the problem is the priests who abused children, but as breadgirl points out, priests are not the only people who have abused children. (Hardly! What a bright world this would be!) Perhaps such people are mentally ill in some way, or there are other factors that diminish their moral responsibility.
The real problem faced by the Church is the bishops who protected such men, and put them in a position to continue their evil behavior. That cannot be excused by invoking mental illness, nor can it be excused by invoking some prior personal bad experience. This was simply horrible behavior, and at a high level of management. Please note also that while some offender priests have been defrocked (and some even jailed) no bishop has been punished for his behavior in this regard.
To me this means that complicity exists at the highest levels. Not good news.
Oh! your word-painting!
[Priests] suffer the problems single men suffer. They get lonely on Friday nights. They eat out of tins over the sink. They like to be invited to parties. They like to go out with friends to the movies. They like women who don't make scary demands of them.
it all reminded me of THIS little bit of nonsense which the Sober Sophomore has been intermittently peddling; I think all the rest can be found here.
'They eat out of tins over the sink.' That's a very good observation! I'm glad it's not just me then! :-)
Amusingly, I have just had an email from a priest protesting that he doesn't get lonely on Friday nights, he doesn't like parties, he prefers to go to films alone and he certainly doesn't eat out of tins over the sink.
However, I think he must be an unusually tranquil soul. And, meanwhile, yes--Single people often eat out of tins over the sink, which is a sad thought, but it does save on having to wash dishes and wipe the table.
Me, as a Single woman I had a bad stretch of eating ice-cream straight out of the tub. Alas! So ruinous for the figure.
Very thoughtful post, Seraphic. When the scandals were happening over here in the U.S., I asked a wise old priest friend what I and my lay friends could do to support and encourage our priest friends. And he said exactly what you suggested: invite them over for dinner, talk to them. Basically, treat them like family.
I have a couple of very close friends who are priests in two other dioceses. The depth of those friendships is quite different than those I have with the local parish priests, but I still treat my local priest friends like one of the family.
The one difference I would point out in your point that priests are very much like any other single men, is that they are VERY celibate and VERY off limits. I have seen too many hearts get broken and vocations thrown away b/c this is not kept in mind.
BTW - what is the picture of? I love the weeping angel!!
Quite correct, Mikaela. That's why I stressed single men and married couples befriending priests.
Women who go after priests are...well, I won't say pond scum, because I've known women who have had affairs with priests and, although broken, they weren't pond scum. Needless to say, they were not big fans of priestly celibacy and mistresses of the art of justifying bad behaviour.
There are needy men and needy women who think Father's kindness is an invitation for them to make moves on him. This is why priests have to be careful and also make sure they get their emotional support OUTSIDE their parishes.
And then it has to be said that some priests go after women. I know of one male religious who was notorious for having affairs before his superiors finally kicked him out and he married his current girlfriend.
Priests should make friends only with men and women who are chaste, prudent and have other people as their primary companions. As I've said before, if your priest is your very bestest friend, you (and possibly he) have a problem.
I don't know where I got the photo! Google "weeping angel" and see if it comes up.
One of my closest friends is a priest. I love him dearly, and vice versa. He's a missionary, however, and we seldom see each other, and then almost always in the company of my husband.
We have to be careful with this one, because he's very much attracted to me (and has said as much). He's the needy one this time. Luckily I am not sexually attracted to him (and wouldn't be, even if we were both single and available) and he has taken the better (?) course and acquired another girlfriend elsewhere. Better for me, anyway. I haven't inquired into the particulars (because I don't want to know!).
I have a lot of sympathy for my friend's position. He's in his 60's, as I am, and the Church (and his Order) are not providing the emotional support which are needed by every human being. Priests now are in a tough situation, as the original post points out. We need to pray for them always.
(For the sake of non-American readers, I should explain that "Gimp" in this context is a tongue-in-cheek self-discription of having had knee surgery. It is a very un-P.C. term (now mostly in disuse) for someone who walks with a limp or can't walk at all.)
I'm very sorry to read of this priest's sexual misconduct. It is a scandal, and I'm unsure if I should have allowed this comment. I'm leaving it as an example that although we pray for priests and make friends with good priests of high moral character, not all priests are good or safe people--something the Irish Scandals demonstrate, too.
To be frank, I have no patience with priests who publicize their sexual sins to laypeople and try to get sympathy and applause for them. It's called SCANDAL.
As to religious order not supplying enough emotional support, bullsh-. It's the male religious version of "My wife doesn't understand me." And having been in close contact with a religious order for a few years, I don't buy it.
All this priest has to do is come clean to his superior about his loneliness, his temptations, the luscious local women, and there will be psychotherapy on tap, a change of scenery--many things the average single man outside of religious life would not and could not expect.
One excuse sexual incontinent priests like to make is, "I've given up so much, I deserve this little bit of happiness." It is also bullsh--. And it leads not just to "consensual" sex between adults but to child abuse too.
I have so much love and respect for good, striving priests and so much shame anger about bad, scandalous priests, that I think I'd better stop writing right now before my head explodes
The one difference I would point out in your point that priests are very much like any other single men, is that they are VERY celibate and VERY off limits. I have seen too many hearts get broken and vocations thrown away b/c this is not kept in mind.
Fr Benedict Groschel acknowledges that a priest needs female friendship but he said that a priest should always make friends with a woman to whom he is not sexually attracted e.g. a woman his mother's age. The presence of a husband is not enough to stop chemistry.
I quite agree with you seraphic re the priest breaking his vows and the 6th Commandment.
Post a Comment